(Adam) Back yet again! - trying to re-create the narrative control of old on Twitter

Last week I recommended to Adam, if he really wants to keep BTC's dominance going as long as possible, that he and the other prominent maxis need to stop talking about BCH. https://old.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/1btatsv/stop_drinking_the_brawndo/kxog1xi/

But instead, he is taking the lead and recommending his maxi buddies to prevent their followers from being able to see responses to their nonsense by preventing BCHers from seeing their nonsense: https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/1776778857862873388

The problem they're going to find, however, is that contrary to last time, where they could count on a handful of r/Bitcoin and bitcointalk mods to control the narrative (and even - with their being at arms length - to occasionally protest that they disagree with censorship), this time it's different.

This time, each and every maxi who wants to say nonsense about big blocks / big blockers / BCHers on Twitter will individually need to block each and everyone who doesn't fall for their nonsense so that they can't respond. Creating their environment free of criticism to the small-blocker narrative and other BTC maxi nonsense will be a long-term virtually impossible task for them.

They had it so easy last time. I don't envy them trying to repeat their success with today's distribution of media - and with the truth of big blocks and the reality of what BCH is (and even its price revival) only a few clicks or search terms away for anyone.

If they really want to delay BTC's probable demise as long as possible, they really really should ignore it / us. But so far, it's looking like they are so triggered, they don't have the discipline to do so. It's popcorn time for the blockers